Monday 30 January 2017

Satan, THE ONLY god of TRINITY - Satanic Trinity





After taking time to show many Christians what the scriptures says about the true nature of God and also revealing the Origin of Trinity. That the nature of God according to the scriptures is Godhead, which means one personality making up God. Many doubting Thomas and hardened hearted ones still find it difficult to believe the Truth of God's Word, but they will rather go through the broad* way because of gifts and positions and denied the narrow way of the Truth. The Bible has declared it that only few will find it, and that's why only few will make it up in the Rapture. 

But, the Holy Spirit is still compelling me to teach once more about this false Doctrine of trinity. Many Christians always ask me, what is trinity? 

What is Trinity?
I think now is the best time to answer their question. For sure, the word "trinity" is never of God and is not in the scriptures, but I will define it according to the definition the founding fathers of Trinity gave it. They say and I quote
Trinity means three distinct and different persons that make up God. God the Father, God the Son and God the HolyGhost. (That is three lords, three persons, three bodies and three spirits cause each persons has their own spirit). And no scriptural backing for this. 

What is Godhead?
Godhead simply means one person that make up God who can operate and function in diverse offices as Father, Son,  Holy Spirit, Saviour, Healer, Deliverer, Redeemer, Angel,  etc but still one person. God is One Lord, One Person, One Body and One Spirit. Col. 1:19, 2:9 and Eph 4:4 - 6.

So, the difference is very clear. But unfortunately many of these trinity believers and their founding fathers ignorantly and intentionally give in to this lie of the devil just because of worldly gains and popularity. Satan himself knew and believe there is only one God, 
James 2:19, but since he knew he is the one that operate as trinity at the end of time after the Rapture. 
James 2:18-19
[18]Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
[19]Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.


The Satanic Trinity 

Revelation 16:13
[13]And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.

The Scripture above revealed that at the end of time the time, Three different and distinct persons will work together to fulfill the same mission and assignment. This three persons have their individual unclean spirit of the devil. 
These three are:-

(1). Satan (The Dragon)
Revelation 20:2
[2]And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

(2). TheAntichrist (The Beast out of the sea) 
Revelation 13:1-2
[1]And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
[2]And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

(3). The False Prophet (The Beast out of the earth). 
Revelation 13:1-2,11-12
[1]And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
[2]And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
[11]And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
[12]And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.

During the great Tribulation just after the Rapture, these three shall work together for same mission and purpose. They will deceive so many people and compel them to worship the dragon and the image of the beast... 

Revelation 16:14-16
[14]For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.
[15]Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.
[16]And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.
(Also read Rev. 9:11-14, 19-21).

Time will not permit me, I would have talk more on these three personalities, but the Scripture reveals what their end shall be
Revelation 19:20
[20]And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.

I believe a true child of God should see now that Satan is the only god of Trinity and Trinity i false doctrine comes from him.
God is never an author of confusion, satan is. Many defenders of trinity always pick two or three scriptures to defend trinity, but our previous article, it revealed with more than 70 scriptures that Trinity is of the devil not from God.

As simple as this looks like, many Christians will miss the Rapture just because of this and that's why we are sounding it loud and clear now. Someone may say it's not possible to miss the Rapture because of Trinity. But they forgot to take note that they intentionally refused to believe and accept the revealed Truth of the Word of God in its Totality rather they choose to believe the lies of men and of the devil. 
Believing in Trinity God indicate that the Christian did not know the God he is serving, He did not know His name. Also such a Christian is expecting to see 3 lords on three different thrones in heaven  (that is He want to marry 3 Bridegrooms), and God been God who is not a Fornicator and never know any other God beside Him will deny such a foolish Christian the Marriage Supper of he Lamb which take place in heaven immediately after the Rapture. 

So let him that desire to go up in the Rapture and partake in the Marriage Supper of the Lamb should quickly do the needful right now which are:-
*Believe Every Word of God in its Totality (100%),Mat. 4:4
*Disbelieve Trinity and Believe Godhead 
*Be baptize in the name of the LORD Jesus Christ 
*Come out of Babylonian Churches... (Rev 18:4-5).
*By so doing God will receive you as a wise virgins and count       you worthy to go up in the Rapture.

There are many events that the translated saints will partake of apart from the Marriage Supper of the Lamb. Let him that is interested for more insight on these events should log on to www.endtimehub.blogspot.com

Remain blessed!!! 


Monday 16 January 2017

UNDERSTANDING GODHEAD - What the Bible Says




After taking time to explain the origin and History of Trinity, it's expedient to explain what the Bible says about the nature of God. The Scriptures only spoke on Godhead, nothing like Trinity in the Bible.
I would have like to teach deeply on Godhead but we need to move to the last sub-topic under Mystery Babylon Series which is Commercial Babylon. So,  for now I'm just going to give a summary in a 60 -  question form with scriptural answers. This will make a child of God see in the light of the scriptures that Trinity is a false Doctrine from the Pit of hell and Babylon, Godhead is the Truth and that's what you should believe not Trinity.

Carefully and Patiently study with your Bible for a profound understanding....

1. Is the word trinity in the Bible? No.
2. Does the Bible say that there are three persons in the Godhead? No.
3. Does the Bible speak of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost? Yes.
4. Do these titles as used in Matthew 28:19 mean that there are three separate and distinct persons in the Godhead? No, they refer to three offices, roles, or relationship to humanity.
5. Does the Bible use the word three in reference to God? Only one verse in the entire Bible does so- 1 John 5:7 . It speaks of the Father, the Word (instead of Son), and the Holy Ghost, and it concludes by saying, “These three are one.”
6. Does the Bible use the word one in reference to God? Yes, many times. For example, see
Zechariah 14:9 ; Malachi 2:10 ; Matthew 23:9 ;
Mark 12:29, 32; John 8:41; 10:30 ; Romans 3:30 ;
1 Corinthians 8:4 ; Galatians 3:20 ; 1 Timothy 2:5 ; James 2:19 
7. Can the mystery of the Godhead be understood? Yes. Romans 1:20 ; Colossians 2:9 ; 1 Timothy 3:16 .
8. Has the Christian only one Heavenly Father? Yes.
Matthew 23:9 .
9. Then why did Jesus say to Philip, “He that hath seen me hath seen the Father”
( John 14:39 )? Because Jesus is the express image of God’s person. Hebrews 1:3.
The Greek word for person in this verse literally means “substance.”
10. Does the Bible say that there are two persons in the Godhead? No.
11. Does the Bible say that all the Godhead is revealed in one person? Yes, in Jesus Christ.
2 Corinthians 4:4 ; Colossians 1:19; 2:9 ; Hebrews 1:3 .
12. Is the mystery of the Deity hidden from some people? Yes. Luke 10:21-22 .
13. Who is the Father? The Father is the one God, particularly as revealed in parental relationship to humanity. Deuteronomy 32:6 ; Malachi 2:10 .
14. Where was God the Father while Jesus was on earth? The Father was in Christ.
John 14:10 ; 2 Corinthians 5:19 . He was also in heaven, for God is omnipresent.
15. Did the prophet Isaiah say that Jesus would be the Father? Yes. Isaiah 9:6; 63:16 .
16. When God said, “Let us make man in our image” ( Genesis 1:26 ), was He speaking to another person in the Godhead? No. Isaiah 44:24 ; Malachi 2:10 .
17. How many of God’s qualities were in Christ? All. Colossians 2:9 .
18. How may we see the God who sent Jesus into the world? By seeing Jesus. John 12:44-45; 14:9 .
19. Does the Bible say that Jesus is the Almighty? Yes. Revelation 1:8
20. Whom do some designate as the first person in the trinity? God the Father.
21. Whom do some designate as the last person in the trinity? The Holy Ghost. But Jesus said that He was the first and last. Revelation 1:17-18
22. How many persons did John see sitting on the throne in heaven? One. Revelation 4:2 .
23. If Jesus is the first and the last, why did God say in Isaiah 44:6 that He was the first and the last? Because Jesus Christ is the God of the Old Testament incarnate.
24. Did Jesus tell Satan that God alone should be worshipped? Yes. Matthew 4:10
25. Does the devil believe in more than one God? No. James 2:19 .
26. Does the Bible say that God, who is the Word, was made flesh? Yes John 1:1, 14.
27. For what purpose was God manifested in the flesh? To save sinners. Hebrews 2:9, 14 .
28. Was Jesus God manifested in the flesh? Yes.
1 Timothy 3:16 .
29. Was Jesus on earth and in heaven at the same time? Yes. John 3:13 .
30. Does the Bible say that there is but one Lord? Yes.
Isaiah 45:18 ; Ephesians 4:5 .
31. Does the Bible say that Christ is the Lord? Yes.
Luke 2:11 .
32. Does the Bible say that the Lord is God? Yes. I kings 18:39; Zechariah 14:5 ; Acts 2:39 ; Revelation 19:1 .
33. How could the church belong to Jesus ( Matthew 16:18 ) and yet be the church of God ( 1 Corinthians 10:32 )? Because Jesus is God in the flesh.
34. Will God give His glory to another? No. Isaiah 42:8 .
35. Was there a God formed before Jehovah, or will there be one formed after? No. 
Isaiah 43:10 .
36. What is one thing that God does not know? Another God. Isaiah 44:8 .
37. What is one thing that God Cannot do? Lie.
Titus 1:2 .
38. How many Gods should we know? Only one.
Hosea 13:4 .
39. How many names has the Lord? One.
Zechariah 14:9 .
40. Is it good to think upon the name of the Lord? Yes. Malachi 3:16 .
41. Does the Bible say that God alone treads upon the waves of the sea? Yes. Job 9:8
42. Why, then, was Jesus able to walk upon the Sea of Galilee ( Matthew 14:25 )? Because He is God the Creator. Colossians 1:16 .
43. Is God the only one who can forgive sin? Yes. Isiah 43:25; Mark 2:7 .
44. Why, then, could Jesus forgive sin in Mark 2:5-11 ? Because He is God the Savior.
45. Is Jesus the true God? Yes. 1 John 5:20 .
46. If God and the Holy Ghost are two separate persons, which was the Father of Christ?
Matthew 1:20 says that the Holy Ghost was the Father, while Romans 15:6 , 
2 Corinthians 11:31 , and Ephesians 1:3 say that God was the Father. There is no contradiction when we realize that God the Father and the Holy Ghost are one and the same Spirit. Matthew 10:20 ; Ephesians 4:4 ; 1 Corinthians 3:16 .
47. When Paul asked the Lord who He was, what was the answer? “I am Jesus.” Acts 9:5 .
48. When Stephen was dying, did he call God Jesus? Yes. Acts 7:59 .
49. Did Thomas ever call Jesus God? Yes. John 20:28 .
50. How could Jesus be the Savior, when God the Father said in Isaiah 43:11 , “Beside me there is no Savior?” Because “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself.”
2 Corinthians 5:19 .
51. Does the Bible say that Jesus was God with us? Yes. Matthew 1:23 .
52. Did Jesus ever say, “I and my Father are one?” Yes. John 10:30 .
53. Can it be proved scripturally that Jesus and the Father are one in the same sense that husband and wife are one? No. The Godhead was never compared to the relationship of a husband and wife. Jesus identified Himself with the Father in a way that husband and wife cannot be identified with each other. John 14:9-11 .
54. Does the Bible say that there is only one wise God? Yes. Jude 25 .
55. Does the Bible call the Holy Ghost a second or third person in the Godhead? No. The Holy Ghost is the one Spirit of God, the one God Himself at work in our lives. John 4:24 ; 
1 Corinthians 3:16-17; 6:19; 12 :13.
56. Can Trinitarians show that three divine persons were present when Jesus was baptized by John? Absolutely not. The one, omnipresent God used three simultaneous manifestations. Only one divine person was present–Jesus Christ the Lord.
57. Then what were the other two of whom Trinitarians speak? One was a voice from heaven; the other was the Spirit of God in the form of a dove. Matthew 3:16-17 .
58. What did the voice say at Jesus’ baptism? “Thou art my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” Mark 1:11 . As the Son of God, Jesus was the one God incarnate.
59. Does the Bible say that God shed His blood and that God laid down His life for us? Yes. Acts 20:28 ; 1 John 3:16.
God was able to do this because He had taken upon Himself a human body.
60. The Bible says that God is coming back with all his saints ( Zechariah 14:5 ) and also that Jesus is coming back with all his saints ( 1 Thessalonians 3:13 ). Are two coming back? No. Only one is coming back–our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ. Titus 2:13 .

*Taken from the Word Aflame Tract “60 Questions on the Godhead with Bible answers” #6125
Word Aflame Press
8855 Dunn Rd.
Hazelwood, MO 63042-2299

I want to believe this should settle every doubt in the heart of many christians out there who find it difficult to believe the Truth of God's Word and disbelieve the lie of satan and Babylon.

The last message to this Age is to come out of Babylon in order not to miss the Rapture.  The Time is very short and Christ is at the Door. Don't Trade your full & total redemption for anything man or church.

With Godhead I Stand, No to Trinity....

DOMINALTI for CHRIST 
On Behalf of End Time Hub!!!

Friday 6 January 2017

THE TRUTH ABOUT TRINITY - Part 2






"And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” ( John 8:32 ).

We are still on our series, Mystery Babylon. We are looking at the Wine of her fornication which are false and unscriptural doctrines that she has made the inhabitants of the earth drunk. 
In our last two articles, we looked at the Truth about Christmas. I believe you find it revelatory and also an eye opener to the Truth. 
In our previous article, I started the part one of the Truth about Trinity, showing the Origin and History of Trinity. Now let's move on to the part two of this topic... 

Most people assume that everything that bears the label “Christian” must have originated with Jesus Christ and His early followers. But this is definitely not the case. All we have to do is look at the words of Jesus Christ and His apostles to see that this is clearly not true.
The historical record shows that, just as Jesus and the New Testament writers foretold, various heretical ideas and teachers rose up from within the early Church and infiltrated it from without. Christ Himself warned His followers: “Take heed that no one deceives you. For many will come in My name . . . and will deceive many” ( Matthew 24:4-5 ).
You can read many similar warnings in other passages (such as Matthew 24:11 ;Acts 20:29-30 ; 2 Corinthians 11:13-15 ; 2 Timothy 4:2-4 ; 2 Peter 2:1-2 ; 1 John 2:18-26 ;1 John 4:1-3 ).


Barely two decades after Christ’s death and resurrection, the apostle Paul wrote that many believers were already “turning away . . . to a different gospel” ( Galatians 1:6 ). He wrote that he was forced to contend with “false apostles, deceitful workers” who were fraudulently “transforming themselves into apostles of Christ” ( 2 Corinthians 11:13 ). One of the major problems he had to deal with was “false brethren”
(2 Cor 11:26 ).
By late in the first century, as we see from 3 John 9-10, conditions had grown so dire that false ministers openly refused to receive representatives of the apostle John and were excommunicating true Christians from the Church!
Of this troubling period Edward Gibbon, the famed historian, wrote in his classic work The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire of a “dark cloud that hangs over the first age of the church” (1821, Vol. 2, p. 111).
It wasn’t long before true servants of God became a marginalized and scattered minority among those calling themselves Christian. A very different religion, now compromised with many concepts and practices rooted in ancient paganism (such mixing of religious beliefs being known as syncretism, common in the Roman Empire at the time), took hold and transformed the faith founded by Jesus Christ.

Historian Jesse Hurlbut says of this time of transformation: “We name the last generation of the first century, from 68 to 100 A.D., ‘The Age of Shadows,’ partly because the gloom of persecution was over the church, but more especially because of all the periods in the [church’s] history, it is the one about which we know the least. We have no longer the clear light of the Book of Acts to guide us; and no author of that age has filled the blank in the history . . .
“For fifty years after St. Paul’s life a curtain hangs over the church, through which we strive vainly to look; and when at last it rises, about 120 A.D. with the writings of the earliest church fathers, we find a church in many aspects very different from that in the days of St. Peter and St. Paul” ( The Story of the Christian Church, 1970, p. 33).

This “very different” church would grow in power and influence, and within a few short centuries would come to dominate even the mighty Roman Empire!
By the second century, faithful members of the Church, Christ’s “little flock” (Luke 12:32 ), had largely been scattered by waves of deadly persecution. They held firmly to the biblical truth about Jesus Christ who is God Almighty , though they were persecuted by the Roman authorities as well as those who professed Christianity but were in reality teaching “another Jesus” and a “different gospel” ( 2 Corinthians 11:4 ; Galatians 1:6-9 ).

Different ideas about Christ’s divinity lead to conflict

This was the setting in which the doctrine of the Trinity emerged. In those early decades after Jesus Christ’s ministry, death and resurrection, and spanning the next few centuries, various ideas sprang up as to His exact nature. Was He man? Was He God? Was He God appearing as a man? Was He an illusion? Was He a mere man who became God? Was He created by God the Father, or did He exist eternally with the Father?
All of these ideas had their proponents. The unity of belief of the original Church was lost as new beliefs, many borrowed or adapted from pagan religions, replaced the teachings of Jesus and the apostles.

Let us be clear that when it comes to the intellectual and theological debates in those early centuries that led to the formulation of the Trinity, the true Church was largely absent from the scene, having been driven underground.
For this reason, in that stormy period we often see debates not between truth and error, but between one error and a different error— a fact seldom recognized by many modern scholars yet critical for our understanding.

A classic example of this was the dispute over the nature of Christ that led the Roman emperor Constantine the Great to convene the Council of Nicaea (in modern-day western Turkey) in A.D. 325.
Constantine, although held by many to be the first “Christian” Roman Emperor, was actually a sun-worshiper who was only baptized on his deathbed. During his reign he had his eldest son and his wife murdered. He was also vehemently anti-Semitic, referring in one of his edicts to “the detestable Jewish crowd” and “the customs of these most wicked men”—customs that were in fact rooted in the Bible and practiced by Jesus and the apostles.
As emperor in a period of great tumult within the Roman Empire, Constantine was challenged with keeping the empire unified. He recognized the value of religion in uniting his empire. This was, in fact, one of his primary motivations in accepting and sanctioning the “Christian” religion (which, by this time, had drifted far from the teachings of Jesus Christ and the apostles and was Christian in name only).
But now Constantine faced a new challenge. Religion researcher Karen Armstrong explains in A History of God that “one of the first problems that had to be solved was the doctrine of God . . . a new danger arose from within which split Christians into bitterly warring camps” (1993, p. 106).

Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea in the year 325 as much for political reasons—for unity in the empire—as religious ones. The primary issue at that time came to be known as the Arian controversy.
“In the hope of securing for his throne the support of the growing body of Christians he had shown them considerable favor and it was to his interest to have the church vigorous and united. The Arian controversy was threatening its unity and menacing its strength. He therefore undertook to put an end to the trouble. It was suggested to him, perhaps by the Spanish bishop Hosius, who was influential at court, that if a synod were to meet representing the whole church both east and west, it might be possible to restore harmony.
“Constantine himself of course neither knew nor cared anything about the matter in dispute but he was eager to bring the controversy to a close, and Hosius’ advice appealed to him as sound” (Arthur Cushman McGiffert, A History of Christian Thought, 1954, Vol. 1, p. 258).
Arius, a priest from Alexandria, Egypt, taught that Christ, because He was the Son of God, must have had a beginning and therefore was a special creation of God. Further, if Jesus was the Son, the Father of necessity must be older.
Opposing the teachings of Arius was Athanasius, a deacon also from Alexandria. His view was an early form of Trinitarianism wherein the Father, Son and Holy Spirit were one but at the same time distinct from each other.

Karen Armstrong explains in A History of God:
“When the bishops gathered at Nicaea on May 20, 325, to resolve the crisis, very few would have shared Athanasius’s view of Christ. Most held a position midway between Athanasius and Arius” (p. 110).
As emperor, Constantine was in the unusual position of deciding church doctrine even though he was not really a Christian. (The following year is when he had both his wife and son murdered, as previously mentioned).
Historian Henry Chadwick attests, “Constantine, like his father, worshipped the Unconquered Sun” ( The Early Church, 1993, p. 122). As to the emperor’s embrace of Christianity, Chadwick admits, “His conversion should not be interpreted as an inward experience of grace . It was a military matter. His comprehension of Christian doctrine was never very clear”
(p. 125).
Chadwick does say that Constantine’s deathbed baptism itself “implies no doubt about his Christian belief,” it being common for rulers to put off baptism to avoid accountability for things like torture and executing criminals (p. 127). But this justification doesn’t really help the case for the emperor’s conversion being genuine.

Norbert Brox, a professor of church history, confirms that Constantine was never actually a converted Christian: “Constantine did not experience any conversion; there are no signs of a change of faith in him. He never said of himself that he had turned to another god . . . At the time when he turned to Christianity, for him this was Sol Invictus (the victorious sun god)” ( A Concise History of the Early Church, 1996, p. 48).

When it came to the Nicene Council,
The Encyclopaedia Britannica states: “Constantine himself presided, actively guiding the discussions, and personally proposed . . . the crucial formula expressing the relation of Christ to God in the creed issued by the council . . . Overawed by the emperor, the bishops, with two exceptions only, signed the creed, many of them much against their inclination” (1971 edition, Vol. 6, “Constantine,” p. 386).
With the emperor’s approval, the Council rejected the minority view of Arius and, having nothing definitive with which to replace it, approved the view of Athanasius—also a minority view. The church was left in the odd position of officially supporting, from that point forward, the decision made at Nicaea to endorse a belief held by only a minority of those attending.
The groundwork for official acceptance of the Trinity was now laid—but it took more than three centuries after Jesus Christ’s death and resurrection for this unbiblical teaching to emerge!
Nicene decision didn’t end the debate

Debate shifts to the nature of the Holy Spirit

Disagreements soon centered around another issue, the nature of the Holy Spirit. In that regard, the statement issued at the Council of Nicaea said simply, “We believe in the Holy Spirit.” This “seemed to have been added to Athanasius’s creed almost as an afterthought,” writes Karen Armstrong. “People were confused about the Holy Spirit. Was it simply a synonym for God or was it something more?” (p. 115). Armstrong concludes, “For many Western Christians . . . the Trinity is simply baffling” (ibid.).
Ongoing disputes lead to the Council of Constantinople
In the year 381, 44 years after Constantine’s death, Emperor Theodosius the Great convened the Council of Constantinople (today Istanbul, Turkey) to resolve these disputes. Gregory of Nazianzus, recently appointed as archbishop of Constantinople, presided over the council and urged the adoption of his view of the Holy Spirit.

The Trinity becomes official doctrine

The council adopted a statement that translates into English as, in part: “We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all ages . . . And we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of life, who proceeds from the Father, who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who spoke by the prophets . . .” The statement also affirmed belief “in one holy, catholic [meaning in this context universal, whole or complete] and apostolic Church . . .”
With this declaration in 381, which would become known as the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed, the Trinity as generally understood today became the official belief and teaching concerning the nature of God.

Theology professor Richard Hanson observes that a result of the council’s decision “was to reduce the meanings of the word ‘God’ from a very large selection of alternatives to one only,” such that “when Western man today says ‘God’ he means the one, sole exclusive [Trinitarian] God and nothing else” ( Studies in Christian Antiquity, 1985,pp. 243-244).
Thus we see that a teaching that was foreign to Jesus Christ, never taught by the apostles and unknown to the other biblical writers, was locked into place and the true biblical revelation about the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit was locked out. Any who disagreed were, in accordance with the edicts of the emperor and church authorities, branded heretics and dealt with accordingly.

Why believe a teaching that isn’t biblical?

This, in brief, is the amazing story of how the doctrine of the Trinity came to be introduced—and how those who refused to accept it came to be branded as heretics or unbelievers.

But should we really base our view of God on a doctrine that isn’t spelled out in the Bible, that wasn’t formalized until three centuries after the time of Jesus Christ and the apostles, that was debated and argued for decades (not to mention for centuries since), that was imposed by religious councils presided over by novices or nonbelievers and that was “decided by the method of trial and error”? 
Of course not. We should instead look to the Word of God—not to ideas of men—to see how our Creator reveals Himself! That's when you are truly a Christian. 

So, the question is what did the scriptures say about God Himself. Is it Godhead or Trinity? What's the difference between Godhead and Trinity? Should I believe Godhead or Trinity? Stay Connected for our next article, where this questions will be answered from the scriptures.

Stay Connected to our websites for our teachings and articles.


For our Facebook page, Log on to


Remain Blessed! 

DOMINALTI for CHRIST.... 
On Behalf of End Time Hub!!!